FT Executive Education Rankings 2020: methodology and key
This is the 22nd edition of the Economical Periods rankings of the world’s top vendors of customised and open up-enrolment government instruction programmes.
The customised ranking options the best 85 small business educational facilities — these are classes customized to the instruction needs of the organisations that fee them. The 2nd ranking contains the best seventy five educational facilities for open up-enrolment programmes — classes on certain subjects, these as leadership, that are directed to pros regardless of their employer. A third, put together ranking lists the best 50 educational facilities for government instruction, calculated from the customised and open up tables.
Universities taking section ought to be internationally accredited by possibly Equis or AACSB and have acquired revenues of at least $2m in 2019 from possibly their customised or open up-enrolment non-diploma programmes. This year, a overall of 107 educational facilities took section in possibly or both rankings.
The ranking of customised system vendors is compiled using info from the small business educational facilities and their corporate clients in 2019. Just about every college ought to nominate a minimum of 20 clients. At least 5 of them ought to total the FT survey for a college to be qualified for the ultimate ranking.
The FT survey was completed by 1,one hundred thirty five small business college clients this 12 months — a reaction level of fifty six for each cent. Just about every rated their programme on a 10-place scale according to a vary of indicators. Their solutions right inform the initially 10 of the ranking’s conditions, from system design and style to follow-up and potential use, which account for a put together 80 for each cent of the ranking’s pounds.
Customer responses are weighted according to programme kind. Customers choose just one of 3 solutions to categorise their programme: strategic (shipped to best administration and intended to affect a company’s direction) common (shipped to administration on operational areas of a firm) or practical (similar to a certain purpose, these as marketing). Strategic programmes have the biggest weighting and as a result the greatest influence on the ranking.
Responses are also weighted according to the seniority of the person responsible for specifying the system, the dimensions of the customer organisation and the number of educational facilities with which that customer has commissioned customised classes in the past 3 many years.
The very last 5 conditions are calculated from details presented by educational facilities on global clients, overseas programmes, progress, partner educational facilities and college variety.
The open up-enrolment ranking is compiled using info from system vendors and people today who completed their nominated administration programmes in 2019. Universities submit one or two common classes of at least 3 days in size and just one or two sophisticated classes of at least 5 days. At least 20 for each cent of these programmes’ contributors ought to total the FT survey, with a minimum of 20 completed surveys, for a college to be regarded in the ultimate ranking.
A overall of 5,480 contributors answered this year’s open up programme survey — a reaction level of 37 for each cent — score factors of their system on a 10-place scale. Responses by sophisticated and common-amount contributors are put together to estimate the initially 10 ranking conditions.
These conditions, which include the quality of the contributors, of the teaching and the relevance of the skills they acquired, inform 80 for each cent of the ranking. Faculty info are used to estimate the remaining conditions on feminine and global contributors, progress, global locale and partner educational facilities.
For both rankings, details gathered in the preceding two many years is used, wherever out there, to estimate conditions informed by customer and participant responses. If a college has participated for the past 3 many years, the weighting is forty:33:27, with 2020 info counting for forty for each cent. If two many years of details is out there, the weighting is fifty five:45, with 2020 info accounting for fifty five for each cent.
The weightings accorded to the initially 9 and 10 conditions in the customised and open up rankings, respectively, are decided by the amount of value clients and contributors connect to each individual in their surveys for the 2020 ranking. Weightings for these conditions as a result vary a bit from 12 months to 12 months.
Universities that attribute in both rankings are qualified for the put together overall ranking. The best 50 educational facilities are calculated according to an equivalent weighting of the overall scores accomplished in both rankings, somewhat than an regular of ranking positions.
Judith Pizer of Pizer-MacMillan acted as the FT’s databases expert
Important: Customised-enrolment programme
(weights for ranking conditions are shown in brackets as a share of the overall ranking)
The initially 10 conditions, up to and together with “Future use”, are dependent on info from the firms that commissioned government classes.
The future 5 are dependent on info reported by small business educational facilities. Universities are ranked for each individual of these conditions. The very last category, “Total responses‡”, is for details only and does not inform the ranking.
Figures in brackets present the pounds each individual criterion contributes to the overall ranking. The weighting accorded to the initially 9 conditions, from planning to price for money, accounts for 80 for each cent of the overall ranking’s pounds. It is decided by the level of value that clients connect to each individual.
Preparing (eight.three): amount of interaction amongst customer and college, the extent to which clients’ tips have been integrated into the programme, and the performance of the college in integrating its hottest analysis.
Programme design and style (eight.four): adaptability of the system and the willingness of educational facilities to enhance their college with external gurus.
Educating procedures and materials (7.nine): extent to which teaching procedures and resources have been modern and ideal, and involved a ideal blend of educational rigour and functional relevance.
College (eight.four): high-quality of teaching and the extent to which teaching employees labored jointly to current a coherent programme.
New skills and discovering (eight.three): relevance of skills acquired to the office, the relieve with which they have been implemented, and the extent to which the course encouraged new approaches of contemplating.
Observe-up (7.three): extent and performance of follow-up presented right after the system contributors returned to their workplaces.
Aims accomplished (eight.four): extent to which educational and small business expectations have been achieved, and the high-quality of opinions from person contributors to system commissioners.
Facilities (7.four): score of the discovering environment’s high-quality and usefulness, and of supporting means and facilities.
Price for money (7.7): clients’ score of the programme’s design and style, teaching and resources in terms of price for money.
Foreseeable future use (eight.): likelihood that clients would reuse the very same college for other customised programmes in the potential, and whether they would recommission the very same programme.
Worldwide clients (5.): dependent on the share of clients with headquarters outside the house the small business school’s base nation and area.
Overseas programmes (two.): global get to of the school’s customised program
me teaching.
Expansion (5.): dependent on the overall progress in revenues from customised programmes as properly as the progress in revenues from repeat small business.
Associate educational facilities (three.): amount and high-quality of programmes developed or taught in conjunction with other Equis or Association to Progress Collegiate Universities of Company (AACSB) accredited small business educational facilities.
College variety (5.): variety of college college according to citizenship and gender.
Full responses: number of person surveys completed by the school’s clients. Figures in brackets reveal the number of many years of survey info counted to the ranking.
Important: Open up-enrolment programme
(weights for ranking conditions are shown in brackets as a share of the overall ranking)
The initially 10 conditions are dependent on info from programme contributors the future 6 are dependent on info submitted by the small business educational facilities. Ranks are shown for each individual of these conditions, aside from “Female participants”, which demonstrates the share. Figures in brackets present the pounds each individual criterion contributes to the overall ranking. The weighting accorded to the initially 10 conditions, from planning to facilities, accounts for 80 for each cent of the overall ranking’s pounds. It is decided by the amount of value that contributors attach to each individual.
Preparing (7.7): provision of sophisticated details on programme information, and the participant range approach.
Course design and style (eight.six): adaptability of the system and appropriateness of course dimensions, construction and design and style.
Educating procedures and resources (eight.three): extent to which teaching procedures and resources have been modern and ideal, and involved a ideal blend of educational rigour and functional relevance.
College (eight.7): high-quality of the teaching and the extent to which teaching employees labored jointly to current a coherent programme.
High-quality of contributors (7.nine): extent to which other contributors have been of the ideal managerial and educational typical, the global variety of contributors and the high-quality of interaction between friends.
New skills and discovering (eight.7): relevance of skills acquired to the office, the relieve with which they have been implemented, and the extent to which the system inspired new approaches of contemplating.
Observe-up (7.three): amount of follow-up presented right after contributors returned to their workplaces, and networking prospects with fellow contributors.
Aims accomplished (eight.four): extent to which personal and professional expectations have been achieved, and the likelihood that contributors would propose the programme.
Food and accommodation (six.eight): score of the high-quality of food and accommodation.
Facilities (7.six): score of the discovering environment’s high-quality and usefulness, and of supporting means and facilities.
Female contributors (two.): share of feminine system contributors.
Worldwide contributors (three.): dependent on the share of contributors from outside the house the small business school’s base nation and area.
Worldwide locale (two.): extent to which programmes are operate outside the house the school’s base nation and area.
Expansion (5.): dependent on the overall progress in revenues from open up programmes as properly as the progress in revenues from repeat small business.
Associate educational facilities (three.): amount and high-quality of programmes taught in conjunction with other Equis or AACSB accredited small business educational facilities.
College variety (5.): variety of college college according to citizenship and gender.